That was one of the most terrifying experiences of my life - not because of the three people there I now have absolutely nothing in common with, and no desire to talk to - but because of the responsibility. I swear I was more worried than
esrunkatsu
Even in these days where even peoples' pets have digital cameras there's a lot of responsibility in being "bride's friend in charge of photography". Still. the results I've been through so far are ok. There are clearly some things I need to do differently in the future (as well as insist on better lit venues) but it's part of the learning process.
Here's one of the reception.

Canon EOS 10D; Sigma 70-200mm f2.8; ISO 800; 1/30sec; 126mm @ f2.8
And one during the service.

Canon EOS 10D; Sigma 24-70mm f2.8; ISO 1600; 1/180sec; 52mm @ f2.8
Many more over the next few days - I'm working on about 200 half-decent ones out of the 550 I took.
Even in these days where even peoples' pets have digital cameras there's a lot of responsibility in being "bride's friend in charge of photography". Still. the results I've been through so far are ok. There are clearly some things I need to do differently in the future (as well as insist on better lit venues) but it's part of the learning process.
Here's one of the reception.

Canon EOS 10D; Sigma 70-200mm f2.8; ISO 800; 1/30sec; 126mm @ f2.8
And one during the service.

Canon EOS 10D; Sigma 24-70mm f2.8; ISO 1600; 1/180sec; 52mm @ f2.8
Many more over the next few days - I'm working on about 200 half-decent ones out of the 550 I took.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 02:53 pm (UTC)If you don't mind I'll point
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 03:01 pm (UTC)Actually when I said "people" I was thinking more of "posed people" rather than gigs where you have no control over your subject.
Does that make sense?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 03:20 pm (UTC)also, i totally agree. there's nothing scarier than being in position to either photographing someone's wedding. especially when you are friends with the couple.
the horrors of wedding photography
Date: 2005-05-08 03:53 pm (UTC)wedding are scarey things to photograph,gah did you have to do the big family shots? there the most choatic and terrifing!
Re: the horrors of wedding photography
Date: 2005-05-08 03:54 pm (UTC)Coming soon to a screen near you...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 07:55 pm (UTC)We knew that it isn't what you do usually and, as I think was appatent when you saw me before the wedding, we were looking for your skill in reportage style images of people doing stuff rather than obsessing over posed portrait shots. After all, how many pictures of his family could a girl want?
The colour church shot is perfect - I was kneeling there thinking how photogenic it was and hoping for a photo of it - real sound of music stuff.
I think I should make a new icon out of the top one!
Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 08:40 pm (UTC)I know you know, but it doesn't hurt to try and get a bit more LJ-sympathy ;-)
I've got the others done, and will upload them somewhere for you to have a look some time over the next 24 hours at a guess.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 09:41 pm (UTC)(I must confess, I now turn down doing weddings, too much pressure there for me.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-08 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 01:26 pm (UTC)Kate... You look beautiful!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 01:28 pm (UTC)Will talk to you at the weekend?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-09 09:47 pm (UTC)