Not a lot to report
May. 21st, 2003 10:05 amHad a very quiet night last with the County Procurement Regulations. I waded through a huge file because I thought it was relevant and then found towards the end "Does not apply to schools". Grrrrr.
Other than that I watched The High Crusade which really wasn't terribly good - and Angel 5.22, twice. I've really warmed to Angel this season - and perhaps tonight I'll go back to Buffy - up to 7.21 are on the coffee table here.
Hmmm - better get into work soon too :-)
Other than that I watched The High Crusade which really wasn't terribly good - and Angel 5.22, twice. I've really warmed to Angel this season - and perhaps tonight I'll go back to Buffy - up to 7.21 are on the coffee table here.
Hmmm - better get into work soon too :-)
no subject
Date: 2003-05-21 04:46 am (UTC)County procurement regulations?
Date: 2003-05-21 05:36 am (UTC)I suppose the private owners revenue will come from the local taxation system and this could be increased to cover sales tax etc. like we do in the other states of the USA. But who would the owners of these counties be accountable for and how would this differ from the current system?
Also it fits in well with introducing private roads into the system, paid for by tolls and the Universities being paid for by fees from the students.
And as I understand it from your LJ this does not apply to schools. I presume that these are to remain in state control and continue as under funded centres of academic apathy.
So which county are you thinking of purchasing?
Re: County procurement regulations?
Date: 2003-05-21 06:14 am (UTC)Re: County procurement regulations?
Date: 2003-05-21 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-21 10:54 am (UTC)The book, by Poul Anderson, OTOH, is incredibly good. If you haven't read it, remind me next time you're down and I'll dig out my copy.