From Saturday
Oct. 26th, 2004 08:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[On the train, which is 40 minutes late getting from Birmingham to Coventry - 60 minutes rather than 20]
On Saturday I spent some time pretending I knew how to take photographs with
charlie_mouse for her not-so-sekrit new venture.
The bulk of the photos aren't really for LJ consumption (appearing at a website near you soon) but here's two. I'm assuming they're worksafe but if anyone complains I'll put a warning and a cut up.
EDIT: Cut for size. Discussion on whether male nipples are any more or less worksafe will follow in comments.


Well, I like them. Let me know what you think.
On Saturday I spent some time pretending I knew how to take photographs with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The bulk of the photos aren't really for LJ consumption (appearing at a website near you soon) but here's two. I'm assuming they're worksafe but if anyone complains I'll put a warning and a cut up.
EDIT: Cut for size. Discussion on whether male nipples are any more or less worksafe will follow in comments.


Well, I like them. Let me know what you think.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:55 am (UTC)Sink me if 't ain't true
Date: 2004-10-26 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:57 am (UTC)My guess would be they are - but I assume that was one implication you are agreeing with.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 02:07 am (UTC)Any pictures which are obviously not work are not worksafe. They're an indication that I'm looking at a non work-related site.
The problem with male nipples is that they would cause one particular person in the area to make loud assertions about my (presumed) sexuality, rather than just "harrumphing" in the case of female nipples - worse, assertions which should I make the equivalent assertions regarding her would result in a very quick trip to a disciplinary panel, and a written warning on my record. Curiously though, harrassment by women (however inaccurate or pathetic) is not regarded as harrassment.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 03:50 am (UTC)I won't insist on nipples :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:11 am (UTC)Jo? I'll have a word and see what she says... the last time someone pointed a proper camera at her the resulting pictures were very very nice. In my opinion, at least.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:20 am (UTC)On the other hand I'm keen to "have a go" with people that I think I can count on not to laugh too loudly at the results. Confidence is slowly building.
Mind you, I can see the attraction of a nice presidential portrait to print on huge banners to hang around the Bristol Pear (Berlin Station c.1940)...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:04 am (UTC)Look me up on IM sometime (contacts on userinfo) and we can chat?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 04:31 am (UTC)I'll give it go
Nitpicking - hopefully useful
Date: 2004-10-26 04:14 am (UTC)The first one I can find nothing to complain about.
I actually really like both of them though. The pose on the second one is lovely for showing off the outfit.
Re: Nitpicking - hopefully useful
Date: 2004-10-26 04:25 am (UTC)I suppose I'd better come clean and admit the second one was posed by
The first one was just cropped a tiny bit from the original image. I did experiment a little with cropping to change the vertical position of the nipple, but in the end left it pretty much where it was shot.
Re: Nitpicking - hopefully useful
Date: 2004-10-26 11:12 am (UTC)But there will be other chances (and other images) later.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 09:04 am (UTC)