From Saturday
Oct. 26th, 2004 08:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[On the train, which is 40 minutes late getting from Birmingham to Coventry - 60 minutes rather than 20]
On Saturday I spent some time pretending I knew how to take photographs with
charlie_mouse for her not-so-sekrit new venture.
The bulk of the photos aren't really for LJ consumption (appearing at a website near you soon) but here's two. I'm assuming they're worksafe but if anyone complains I'll put a warning and a cut up.
EDIT: Cut for size. Discussion on whether male nipples are any more or less worksafe will follow in comments.


Well, I like them. Let me know what you think.
On Saturday I spent some time pretending I knew how to take photographs with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The bulk of the photos aren't really for LJ consumption (appearing at a website near you soon) but here's two. I'm assuming they're worksafe but if anyone complains I'll put a warning and a cut up.
EDIT: Cut for size. Discussion on whether male nipples are any more or less worksafe will follow in comments.


Well, I like them. Let me know what you think.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 01:57 am (UTC)My guess would be they are - but I assume that was one implication you are agreeing with.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 02:07 am (UTC)Any pictures which are obviously not work are not worksafe. They're an indication that I'm looking at a non work-related site.
The problem with male nipples is that they would cause one particular person in the area to make loud assertions about my (presumed) sexuality, rather than just "harrumphing" in the case of female nipples - worse, assertions which should I make the equivalent assertions regarding her would result in a very quick trip to a disciplinary panel, and a written warning on my record. Curiously though, harrassment by women (however inaccurate or pathetic) is not regarded as harrassment.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-26 03:32 am (UTC)